People have been coming out of the woodworks lately. Another guy came forward last year saying it was his dead stepdad and even produced the famous mask, but they have yet to confirm anything on that one either. Personally, I've read quite a bit about that case, and I don't believe we'll ever know the truth, mostly because I believe there are at least two seperate perpetrators of the murders accredited to the Zodiac, and the one they actually have DNA from is unlikely to even be linked at all. As for Robert Greysmith, noted Zodiac "expert," I don't buy anything that guy says. He "unmasked" the Zodiac as Arthur Allen and swore that there was only one killer. When Allen's DNA didn't match the questionable sample, Greysmith said, "I always believed there may have been a second killer."
1 comment:
People have been coming out of the woodworks lately. Another guy came forward last year saying it was his dead stepdad and even produced the famous mask, but they have yet to confirm anything on that one either. Personally, I've read quite a bit about that case, and I don't believe we'll ever know the truth, mostly because I believe there are at least two seperate perpetrators of the murders accredited to the Zodiac, and the one they actually have DNA from is unlikely to even be linked at all. As for Robert Greysmith, noted Zodiac "expert," I don't buy anything that guy says. He "unmasked" the Zodiac as Arthur Allen and swore that there was only one killer. When Allen's DNA didn't match the questionable sample, Greysmith said, "I always believed there may have been a second killer."
Post a Comment