Oh, whatever. I'll just let you all pick your favorite part of this article.
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Hard to pick, but if I had to, I would probably go with this one.
"There's no reason to have any barriers to quality teachers if we don't need them," Anderson told The Boston Sunday Globe. "At the same time, we need to have accountability and assurance that there are basic abilities for any new teacher in Massachusetts."
Can't tell whether the guy realizes there is a barrier inherent in the system to begin with, a barrier against qualified white teachers, or if he is saying that minorities need more of a leg up. Still, these people have been dining on this "affirmative action" B.S. for so long, I wouldn't be surprised if they couldn't the see the constradiction in their own statements.
2 comments:
Hard to pick, but if I had to, I would probably go with this one.
"There's no reason to have any barriers to quality teachers if we don't need them," Anderson told The Boston Sunday Globe. "At the same time, we need to have accountability and assurance that there are basic abilities for any new teacher in Massachusetts."
Can't tell whether the guy realizes there is a barrier inherent in the system to begin with, a barrier against qualified white teachers, or if he is saying that minorities need more of a leg up.
Still, these people have been dining on this "affirmative action" B.S. for so long, I wouldn't be surprised if they couldn't the see the constradiction in their own statements.
Dude, thanks for this article. It's made my day, if not my week, month, or year.
Too much to comment on but we all see the lib-tardness in the whole write up.
And of course they create some bullshit about the test being biased.
Post a Comment