This is a good, no, great thing. But Steele must be put as head of the RNC.
To the uninformed (like I used to be) Newt is a bad man. Steele would provide a much more "hip" face to the RNC, and he gets to start with a much cleaner slate. Newt still carries all the negative MSM baggage from the 80's.
Newt belongs on the speech trail. People need to be given a chance to listen to him, so that they can realize (as I have come to realize) that he is brilliant.
Howard Dean is a "bad man" too and he kicked butt for the DNC. I say we should go with the guy who proved he can do it. With that said, I like Steele a lot, but I don't know if he can handle the job.
3 comments:
This is a good, no, great thing. But Steele must be put as head of the RNC.
To the uninformed (like I used to be) Newt is a bad man. Steele would provide a much more "hip" face to the RNC, and he gets to start with a much cleaner slate. Newt still carries all the negative MSM baggage from the 80's.
Newt belongs on the speech trail. People need to be given a chance to listen to him, so that they can realize (as I have come to realize) that he is brilliant.
Howard Dean is a "bad man" too and he kicked butt for the DNC. I say we should go with the guy who proved he can do it.
With that said, I like Steele a lot, but I don't know if he can handle the job.
I don't think there's that much to do as RNC chair. But what do I know.
Oh, I must restate the decade I mentioned above. The 80's were too early for Newt. Sorry. I meant 90's.
Post a Comment